2009/2010 OMOP Cup: Methods Competition

  • OMOP Cup closed for submissions

    The deadline for entries to the OMOP Cup has passed.  The leaderboard shows unofficial results, and we will be working to determine the winners of each competition in the days to come.  Thanks very much to everyone who participated, and stay tuned for more information about OMOP's next steps.

  • Last day for submissions

    The competition is closing at midnight Eastern daylight time tonight.  If you have any problems submitting, email omopcup@gmail.com and we'll work to remedy the situation.

  • Challenge 1 Leaderboard

    User    Best Score    Last Score    Last Submission
    Martijn J Schuemie 0.2662359 0.2662359 2010-03-31 23:24:58
    David S Vogel 0.2570616 0.2555797 2010-03-31 23:15:03
    Hawkeye DORP 0.2569417 0.2569417 2010-03-31 23:52:33
    Mohammad Khoshneshin 0.2569404 0.2569404 2010-03-30 23:50:18
    Nick Street 0.2568678 0.2568678 2010-03-31 01:43:59
    Craig G Carmichael 0.2483813 0.2483813 2010-03-30 23:32:47
    Harris T Lin 0.2483137 0.2482600 2010-03-28 20:12:35
    girishkumar ramesh sabhnani 0.2358521 0.2358521 2010-03-31 20:19:04
    Liang Xiong 0.2317307 0.2317307 2010-03-31 23:52:34
    Christophe G Giraud-Carrier 0.2310854 0.2310854 2010-03-31 22:22:59
    Vladimir N Nikulin 0.2309664 0.2309664 2010-03-30 21:57:43
    Bin Liu 0.2303903 0.0169422 2010-03-25 09:58:06
    Andrew J Zitzelberger 0.2301842 0.2284187 2010-03-31 22:18:42
    Derrall Heath 0.2301842 0.2301842 2010-03-30 18:25:20
    Nathaniel Gustafson 0.2298511 0.2218545 2010-03-31 17:19:31
    Sam Ogden 0.2298361 0.0387393 2010-03-24 14:00:45
    David L Wilcox 0.2293719 0.2282994 2010-03-30 18:13:23
    Rob Smith 0.2292806 0.2286356 2010-03-30 18:19:41
    Michael T Roscheck 0.2263714 0.2258591 2010-03-31 20:19:49
    Yisong Guo 0.2262477 0.0853151 2010-03-30 18:32:07
    Robin Sabhnani 0.2256460 0.2252408 2010-03-31 23:57:46
    Benchmark (BLR) 0.2244814 0.2244814
    Benchmark (BCPNN-M) 0.2241564 0.2241564
    Peter A Klist 0.2214692 0.2214692 2010-03-31 21:09:37
    James Jeffry Howbert 0.2213942 0.2213942 2010-03-31 00:01:55
    Peng Liu 0.2208596 0.2208596 2010-03-30 13:34:45
    Ed Ramsden 0.2200893 0.2189384 2010-03-21 23:10:25
    Benchmark (BLR-S) 0.2027585 0.2027585
    Benchmark (BLR-L) 0.1935820 0.1935820
    lan huang 0.1814087 0.1791127 2010-03-31 10:51:37
    Benchmark (EB05-M) 0.1763391 0.1763391
    Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi 0.1594768 0.1594768 2010-03-31 23:06:43
    Si-Chi Chin 0.1509865 0.0158022 2010-03-31 11:07:55
    Gautam Parai 0.1488379 0.1488379 2010-03-14 05:41:06
    Benchmark (BCPNN-MS) 0.1483298 0.1483298
    Div Khils 0.1472966 0.1472966 2010-03-14 01:58:03
    Timothy J McKenna 0.1409966 0.1409966 2009-12-11 16:27:03
    Lan Dan 0.1379099 0.0725316 2010-02-19 15:06:29
    Anand R Iyer 0.1293156 0.1293156 2010-03-13 07:11:47
    Benchmark (BCPNN-P) 0.1098078 0.1098078
    Lisa D Friedland 0.1097364 0.1069433 2009-12-01 04:53:23
    HOA V LE 0.1025125 0.1025125 2010-01-14 03:43:41
    Chi Thi Le Truong 0.1025057 0.0252761 2010-02-21 10:12:04
    Benchmark (PRR-M) 0.0999983 0.0999983
    Benchmark (EB05-PS) 0.0947524 0.0947524
    Benchmark (BCPNN-PS) 0.0943663 0.0943663
    Mose Andre 0.0894491 0.0737392 2010-02-21 19:20:21
    Yin Yang 0.0822740 0.0822740 2010-02-24 16:10:10
    Mahtab GH 0.0783682 0.0783682 2010-03-25 12:13:35
    Qing Wang 0.0782222 0.0782222 2010-02-10 15:21:48
    Benchmark (PRR-P) 0.0762629 0.0762629
    Yi Yang 0.0725316 0.0725316 2010-02-19 15:06:29
    Mark Stevens 0.0720408 0.0265722 2010-03-14 17:58:13
    Joran Elias 0.0710696 0.0710696 2009-11-29 12:45:13
    Mike Linacre 0.0506623 0.0506623 2010-03-10 06:51:16
    Benchmark (PRR-MS) 0.0392605 0.0392605
    Benchmark (PRR-PS) 0.0324827 0.0324827
    Nengli Hua 0.0293506 0.0165512 2010-03-14 18:50:37
    Haruki Oh 0.0266130 0.0165278 2010-03-14 16:38:45
    Arindam Gupta 0.0265722 0.0265722 2010-03-14 07:33:51
    Wenwen Hu 0.0253130 0.0176713 2009-12-14 19:27:38
    Raymond Hsu 0.0252996 0.0165278 2010-03-14 16:43:51
    Dave O Oyewole 0.0230293 0.0230293 2010-03-31 14:07:52
    Kevin Hatcher 0.0210602 0.0165278 2010-03-14 16:53:38
    Haruki MI Oh 0.0206028 0.0197321 2010-03-06 22:00:29
    Gautam K Parai 0.0188489 0.0188489 2010-03-14 04:57:51
    James Mining 0.0165411 0.0165411 2010-03-14 18:39:03
    Ray Larkin 0.0157993 0.0157993 2010-03-25 00:20:42
    Benchmark (Random) 0.0157622 0.0157622
  • Challenge 2 Leaderboard

    User    Best Score    Last Score    Last Submission
    Vladimir N Nikulin 0.2376259 0.2124727 2010-03-31 23:17:20
    Martijn J Schuemie 0.2132523 0.2132523 2010-03-31 13:01:05
    Hawkeye DORP 0.2032173 0.2032173 2010-03-31 23:11:51
    David S Vogel 0.2000853 0.2000853 2010-03-31 13:37:33
    Harris T Lin 0.1949657 0.1949657 2010-03-21 16:55:41
    Peng Liu 0.1859670 0.1741811 2010-03-30 23:50:27
    Ed Ramsden 0.1719514 0.1719514 2010-03-23 10:16:05
    Robin Sabhnani 0.1037598 0.1037598 2009-12-01 05:07:34
    Lisa D Friedland 0.1032716 0.1032716 2009-11-29 18:24:41
    Benchmark (Random) 0.0156415 0.0156415
  • Important Scoring Update

    Recently, a few contestants have identified some inconsistencies in our competition documentation and scoring system. After further exploration, we did discover minor issues that required modification. The scoring algorithm now properly excludes the drug-condition pairs in the OMOP_TRUE_RELATIONSHIPS.txt file. There was a typo in the formula for scoring Challenge 2 submissions that has been corrected. The proper calculation is a simple arithmetic mean for the mean average precision across years. The current scoring is consistent with the documentation provided.

    In fairness for the competition, we have rescored all submissions and refreshed the leaderboard based on the corrected scoring system. Note, the leaderboard displays the score to the 7th decimal place, but the official score is based on the full precision calculated by the scoring algorithm. To be fully transparent, we have also updated the documentation (Rules , Challenge 1 , Challenge 2) and posted the source code used to grade the submissions, so everyone has a complete understanding of how the OMOP Cup will be evaluated from now until the end of the contest. We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused. If you have any questions, please contact us at omopcup@gmail.com .

  • OMOP Cup reopens to accept Grand Prize entries

    The submission system is now reopen to accept submissions to be eligible for the Grand Prize. Thanks again to everyone who submitted for the Progress Prize, and good luck to everyone in the months ahead. The Grand Prize, with $15,000 in prize money, closes March 31, 2010.

  • OMOP Announces Progress Prizes for OMOP Cup

    After two months of entries, the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership’s OMOP Cup has reached its first milestone with the announcement of the Progress Prize. Four awards totaling $5,000 were given out to participants who came up with the highest-performing methods that improve the state of the art in identifying adverse drug reactions in medical records. The competition brought together competitors from epidemiology, drug safety, statistics, and machine learning in a cross-disciplinary challenge. The Progress Prizes are only the first part of the OMOP Cup, which culminates with $15,000 in additional prizes in March 2010.

    The OMOP Cup has two related challenges. Challenge 1 explores how well the method works when provided an entire longitudinal dataset, and the goal is to accurately classify which drugs are associated with which outcomes. The winners of the Progress Prize for the first challenge are David Vogel and Eric Gottschalk of Data Mining Solutions, with $2,500 in prize money. Robin Sabhnani of Carnegie Mellon University won $1,000 for second place. Challenge 2 evaluates the timeliness of detection of drug-event associations by having your methods run against data sequentially as it accumulates over time. Robin Sabhnani was in first place, worth $1,000. Lisa Friedland of the University of Massachusetts Amherst took home $500 for second place.

    The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (http://omop.fnih.org) is a public-private partnership designed to help improve the monitoring of drugs for safety. The partnership began in late 2008 and is conducting a two-year research initiative to determine the contribution and utility of using existing healthcare databases to identify and evaluate safety issues of drugs already on the market. The new data sources have now become available but algorithmic progress has lagged. OMOP is conducting research on the feasibility and performance of a wide range of algorithms and statistical methods. We are also seeking new methods and the OMOP Cup is one of several efforts intended to stimulate interest in observational methods development.

    We provided a large simulated dataset that resembles observational data that can be extracted from insurance claims or electronic medical records. The task is to identify relationships in the data between drugs and medical outcomes (adverse events). The goal is to develop methods that correctly identify true drug-event associations while minimizing false positive findings. Methods are evaluated by how closely they predict the known relationships that exist in the data.

  • Progress Prize closed

    The period for progress prize entries is now closed. We are currently in the process of analyzing and double-checking the results. The official announcement of winners will take place on December 5. The grand prize will open soon. Thanks very much to everyone who participated for your hard work.

  • Progress Prize Deadline Today

    The deadline for the progress prize is today, November 30, at 11:59pm Eastern time (5am GMT December 1). At that time, the submissions will close while we begin to take a look at the entries. The submissions will then reopen for the second phase of the competition, leading up to the grand prize in March.

  • OMOP Cup Progress Prize deadline approaching!

    Just a quick reminder that the deadline for OMOP Cup progress prize submissions is just 10 days away! You can submit one entry per day for each challenge. A total of $5000 is up for grabs for the progress prize.

  • Benchmark descriptions

    I’ve added an explanation of some new benchmarks in the Methods Discussion section. As a reminder, these entries are produced by OMOP and not eligible for the competition.

  • Rules clarification

    A slight clarification has been made to the rules regarding the licensing of items submitted to the competition. OMOP intends to release all competition documents and results under the Apache public license at the close of the competition.

  • The OMOP Cup is open!

    Welcome the the OMOP Cup. Registration is now open, and we have details and data for the challenges available.